Search for: All records

Purpose: The equitable distribution of donor kidneys is crucial to maximizing transplant success rates and addressing disparities in healthcare data. This study examines potential gender bias in the Deceased Donor Organ Allocation Model (DDOA) by using machine learning and AI to analyze its impact on kidney discard decisions to ensure fairness in accordance with medical ethics. Methods: The study employs the Deceased Donor Organ Allocation Model (DDOA) model (https://ddoa.mst.hekademeia.org/#/kidney) to predict the discard probability of deceased donor kidneys using donor characteristic from the OPTN Deceased Donor Dataset (2016-2023). Using the SRTR SAF dictionary, the dataset consists of 18,029 donor records, where gender was assessed for its effect on discard probability. ANOVA and t-test determines whether there is a statistically significant difference between the discard percentages for female and male donors by changing the donor gender data alone. If the p-value obtained from the t-test is less than the significance level (typically 0.05), we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference. Otherwise, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Results: Figure 1 visualizes the differences in discard percentages between female and male donor kidneys, with an unbiased allocation system expected to show no difference (i.e., a value of zero). To assess the presence of gender bias, statistical analyses, including t-tests and ANOVA were performed. The t-test comparing female and male kidney discard rates yielded a t-statistic of 29.690228, with a p-value of 3.586956e-189 < 0.05 significance threshold. This result leads to the rejection of the null hypothesis, indicating a significant difference was found between the mean when altering only the donor gender attribute in the DDOA model making it play a significant role in discard decisions. Conclusions: The study highlights that a significant difference was found between the mean by altering only the donor gender attribute, contributing to kidney discard rates in the DDOA model. These findings reinforce the need for greater transparency in organ allocation models and a reconsideration of the demographic criteria used in the evaluation process. Future research should refine algorithms to minimize biases in organ allocation and investigate kidney discard disparities in transplantation. 

(TSFAM) model, an adaptive human-AI teaming framework designed to enhance hard-to-place kidney acceptance decision-making by integrating transplant surgeons’ individualized expertise with advanced AI analytics (Figure 1). Methods: TSFAM is an innovative solution for complex issues in kidney transplant decision-making support. It employs fuzzy associative memory to capture and codify unique decision-making rules of transplant surgeons. Using the Deceased Donor Organ Assessment (DDOA) and Final Acceptance AI models designed to evaluate hard-to-place kidneys, TSFAM integrates fuzzy logic with deep learning techniques to manage inherent uncertainties in donor organ assessments. Surgeon-specifi c ontologies and membership functions are extracted through interviews. Similar to how a pain scale is used for understanding patients, an ontology ambiguity scale is used to develop surgeon rules (Figure 2). Fuzzy logic captures ambiguity and enables the model to adapt to evolving clinical, environmental, and policy conditions. The structured incorporation of human expertise ensures decision support remains closely aligned with local clinical practices and global best evidence. Results: This novel framework incorporates human expertise into AI decisionmaking tools to support donor organ acceptance in transplantation. Integrating surgeon-defi ned criteria into a robust decision-support tool enhances accuracy and transparency of organ allocation decision-making support. TSFAM bridges the gap between data-driven models and nuanced judgment required in complex clinical scenarios, fostering trust and promoting responsible AI adoption. Conclusions: TSFAM fuses deep learning analytics with subtleties of human expertise for a promising pathway to improve decision-making support in transplant surgery. The framework enhances clinical assessment and sets a precedent for future systems prioritizing human-AI collaboration. Prospective studies will focus on clinical implementation with dynamic interfaces for a more patient-centered, evidencebased model in organ transplantation. The intent is for this approach to be adaptable to individual case scenarios and the diverse needs of key transplant team members 

The role of human-machine teams in society is increasing, as big data and computing power explode. One popular approach to AI is deep learning, which is useful for classification, feature identification, and predictive modeling. However, deep learning models often suffer from inadequate transparency and poor explainability. One aspect of human systems integration is the design of interfaces that support human decision-making. AI models have multiple types of uncertainty embedded, which may be difficult for users to understand. Humans that use these tools need to understand how much they should trust the AI. This study evaluates one simple approach for communicating uncertainty, a visual confidence bar ranging from 0-100%. We perform a human-subject online experiment using an existing image recognition deep learning model to test the effect of (1) providing single vs. multiple recommendations from the AI and (2) including uncertainty information. For each image, participants described the subject in an open textbox and rated their confidence in their answers. Performance was evaluated at four levels of accuracy ranging from the same as the image label to the correct category of the image. The results suggest that AI recommendations increase accuracy, even if the human and AI have different definitions of accuracy. In addition, providing multiple ranked recommendations, with or without the confidence bar, increases operator confidence and reduces perceived task difficulty. More research is needed to determine how people approach uncertain information from an AI system and develop effective visualizations for communicating uncertainty. 

Purpose of Review: A transdisciplinary systems approach to the design of an artificial intelligence (AI) decision support system can more effectively address the limitations of AI systems. By incorporating stakeholder input early in the process, the final product is more likely to improve decision-making and effectively reduce kidney discard. Recent Findings: Kidney discard is a complex problem that will require increased coordination between transplant stakeholders. An AI decision support system has significant potential, but there are challenges associated with overfitting, poor explainability, and inadequate trust. A transdisciplinary approach provides a holistic perspective that incorporates expertise from engineering, social science, and transplant healthcare. A systems approach leverages techniques for visualizing the system architecture to support solution design from multiple perspectives. Summary: Developing a systems-based approach to AI decision support involves engaging in a cycle of documenting the system architecture, identifying pain points, developing prototypes, and validating the system. Early efforts have focused on describing process issues to prioritize tasks that would benefit from AI support.